Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2004 (8) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (8) TMI 385 - SC - Companies LawComplaint against five accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 alleging dishonour of a cheque? Held that:- Appeal allowed. As it is evident that in the complaint there are no averments against the appellants except stating in the title that they are partners of the firm. The respondents/complainant contended that a copy of the partnership deed was also filed which would show that the appellants were active in the business. No such document was filed with the complaint or made part thereof. The filing of the partnership deed later is of no consequence for determining the point in issue. Section 141 does not make all partners liable for the offence. The criminal liability has been fastened on those who, at the time of the commission of the offence, was in-charge of and was responsible to the firm for the conduct of the business of the firm. These may be sleeping partners who are not required to take any part in the business of the firm; they may be ladies and others who may not know anything about the business of the firm. The obligation of the appellants to prove that at the time the offence was committed they were not in-charge of and were not responsible to the firm for the conduct of the business of the firm, would arise only when first the complainant makes necessary averments in the complaint and establishes that fact. The present case is of total absence of requisite averments in the complaint.
|