Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2009 (7) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (7) TMI 770 - HC - Companies LawInterim injunction orders - whether without calling for the records from the 1st respondent and without disclosing their defence, the 2nd respondent is not at all entitled to raise the plea of maintainability in the writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy? Held that:- In this case not only the petitioner was given sufficient opportunity he was also given the order copy of the 1st respondent, which the 1st respondent was not obliged, according to the 2nd respondent. Therefore, having regard to the fact that alternative remedy is available to the petitioner and that alternative remedy is effective and efficacious as the Securities Appellate Tribunal is presided over by a retired Judge of High Court and two persons, having full expertise in respect of securities and further appeal remedy is provided to the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the decision of the Tribunal, the present writ petition filed by the petitioner cannot be entertained and hence, it is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed
|