Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (12) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (12) TMI 507 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: ....... and, therefore, there is no merit in the contention of the appellant that it received the order only in April 2003. We find that the appellant has not made out sufficient reason to condone the delay of more than 2 years. In the result we dismiss the application to condone the delay. 4. emsp In view of the above, the appeal itself stands dismissed.
|