Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2004 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (11) TMI 392 - CESTAT, CHENNAIExtract: ....... they ever requested for mutilation of the goods imported by them, nor has the appellant cited the requisite rules providing for such mutilation. Apparently, therefore, Section 24 has been erroneously pressed into service in this case. Therefore, I think, I have adequate reason to stay the operation of the impugned order. It is ordered accordingly.
|