Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2005 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (4) TMI 517 - ITAT MUMBAIDepreciation - Appellate Tribunal - Whether or not the assessee has an option to claim depreciation allowance while computing deduction u/s 80-IA - Effect of Binding Precedents - Rule of per incuriam - HELD THAT:- The effect of binding precedents in India is that the decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all the courts. Indeed, article 141 of the Constitution embodies the rule of precedent. All the subordinate courts are bound by the judgments of the High Court. A single Judge of a High Court is bound by the judgment of another single Judge and a fortiori judgments of Benches consisting of more judges than one. So also, a Division Bench of a High Court is bound by judgments of another Division Bench and Full. A single judge or Benches of High Courts cannot differ from the earlier judgments of co-ordinate jurisdiction merely because they hold a different view on the question of law for the reason that certainty and uniformity in the administration of justice are of paramount importance. But, if the earlier judgment is erroneous or adherence to the rule of precedents results in manifest injustice, differing from the earlier judgment will be permissible. It is thus beyond dispute that a decision which is per incuriam is not a binding judicial precedent. It is also well-settled that when it is not open to a High Court Bench to differ from the decision of a Bench of equal strength, it cannot also be open to a Bench of this Tribunal to differ from the view taken by a co-ordinate Bench of equal strength. The only option in case one doubts the correctness of such a decision is to refer the matter for constitution of a larger Bench. A decision ignoring this rule of precedent, which is duly approved by the Hon’ble Courts from time to time, cannot but be viewed as per incuriam. Therefore, following the Hon’ble AP Court Full Bench decision in the case of B.R. Constructions [1992 (6) TMI 13 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT], such a decision of the co-ordinate Bench was no precedence value. Accordingly, following Hon’ble AP Full Bench judgment in the case of B.R. Constructions (supra), we decline to be guided by the same. In any case, larger Bench request has already been turned down, and, accordingly, the only option open to us is to follow the co-ordinate Bench decision in the case of Plastiblends India Ltd. [2004 (2) TMI 691 - ITAT MUMBAI]. We do so. Accordingly, we hold that it is not open to the Assessing Officer to thrust depreciation allowance while computing deduction u/s 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in a case where the assessee has not claimed the depreciation in the books of account. The assessee gets relief accordingly. In the result, the appeal is allowed.
|