Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2004 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (9) TMI 580 - ITAT DELHIExtract: ....... hands of an unmarried lady and 100 gms. in the case of male person should not be seized. We, therefore, hold that the assessee failed to explain the source of acquisition of the impugned jewellery. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 1,84,000 made by the Assessing Officer stands. 27. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed.
|