Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2006 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (1) TMI 470 - ITAT DELHIDeduction of tax at source - Payment made to TAB was for performing the work of dubbing in various languages and for making beta copies - Liable to deduction of TDS u/s "194C or 194J" - "assessee in default" u/s 201(1) - HELD THAT:- The Explanation to section 191 was inserted by the Finance Act of 2003 w.e.f. 1-6-2003. A plain reading of the aforesaid Explanation would show that it is clarificatory in nature and, therefore, would apply for the financial year involved in these appeal also. In the case of Crescent Housing (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2001 (7) TMI 300 - ITAT MADRAS-C], held that in the event of payment of tax by the recipient (i.e., the payee from the appellant) no further demand could be raised on the person responsible for deducting tax at source. The aforesaid decision related to the financial years 1996-97 and 1997-98. In the said decision even in respect of interest under section 201(1A) it was held that it could be levied only till the date of payment of tax by the payee from the appellant. Even prior to inserting of Explanation to section 191 Courts have taken a view that in a case where the payee pays the tax the payer i.e., the person responsible for deduction of tax at source cannot be held to be an "assessee in default" u/s 201. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT v. Rashikesh Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.[2001 (6) TMI 17 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] and the Hon’ble M.P. High Court in the case of CIT v. M.P. Agro Morarji Fertilizers Ltd.[1988 (9) TMI 30 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] have taken a similar view. The appellant cannot, therefore, be treated as an appellant in default, if it is found that the payee has made payment on tax of the amounts received from the appellant. Consequently the appellant cannot be considered as an "assessee in default". As far as charge of interest is concerned it cannot be from the date of deductibility of tax till the payment by the appellant. On the other hand it could be only put to the date of payment of tax by the payee i.e., M/s. TAB. This is because interest is compensatory in nature and the revenue cannot claim payment of interest for the period when the payee has already paid the taxes to the exchequer. This issue will be academic if it is found that the payee had paid the taxes on due date. For the reasons stated above the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Ground No. 1 of the grounds of appeal of the appellant is allowed to the extent indicated above. In the result TDS is dismissed, while TDS 209 is partly allowed.
|