Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2007 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2007 (2) TMI 494 - AT - Customs

Issues:
1. Confiscation of excess currency by Customs authorities
2. Imposition of penalty under FEMA regulations
3. Failure to predeposit amount for appeal

Analysis:

Confiscation of Excess Currency:
The case involved a small income-tax assessee trading in agricultural implements, traveling to Muscat for the first time with Indian currency amounting to Rs. 96,500. The appellant truthfully disclosed the currency to Customs authorities, who found the excess amount during baggage check. The original authority confiscated the excess currency of Rs. 91,500 and imposed a penalty of Rs. 40,000. The appellant failed to predeposit Rs. 30,000 as required by the lower appellate authority.

Imposition of Penalty under FEMA Regulations:
The judge noted that the appellant, unaware of FEMA regulations, could have converted the currency to US Dollars if informed. Despite the technical breach, the appellant made a true declaration and did not carry more than Rs. 5,000 while traveling abroad. The judge considered the case deserving of lenient treatment and set aside the confiscation. A reduced penalty of Rs. 4,000 was imposed instead of Rs. 40,000, acknowledging the technical breach of FEMA regulations.

Failure to Predeposit Amount for Appeal:
The lower appellate authority dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to predeposit Rs. 30,000. However, the judge's decision to reduce the penalty to Rs. 4,000 implies a favorable outcome for the appellant, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. The stay application was also disposed of in light of the judgment.

In conclusion, the judgment addressed the confiscation of excess currency, imposition of penalty under FEMA regulations, and the appellant's failure to predeposit the required amount for appeal. The judge's decision to set aside the confiscation, reduce the penalty, and allow the appeal with consequential benefits exemplifies a balanced approach considering the circumstances of the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates