Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (7) TMI 995 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......So, the lower authorities has wrongly held that the appellant has availed depreciation on the impugned goods under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act. 11. emsp In the light of the above observations, I do not find any merit in the impugned order and the same is set aside, the appeal is allowed with consequential relief (if any). (Pronounced in Court)
|