Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1964 (3) TMI 81 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURTExtract: ....... Madras, In re 1956 7 S.T.C. 546. If arecanut could fall within the definition of horticultural produce, we fail to see why cocoanut does not answer that description. We, therefore, hold that the tax was rightly levied at the sale point. In the circumstances, the tax revision case is dismissed with costs. Advocate s fee Rs. 100. Petition dismissed.
|