Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1983 (10) TMI 225 - SUPREME COURT
Whether there was any evidence upon which the Disciplinary Committee could reasonably find that they have been guilty of 'professional misconduct, within the meaning of sub-s. of s. 35 of the Act?
Whether the finding of the Disciplinary Committee as to professional misconduct on the part of the appellant can be legally sustained.
Held that:- The appeal partly succeeds and is allowed. The order of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India holding the appellant and A.N. Agavane guilty of professional misconduct is set aside. The proceedings drawn against them under sub-s. (1) of s. 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961 are dropped.