Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2014 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (4) TMI 1131 - HC - Customs


Issues involved: Challenge to rejection of application for condonation of delay in preferring an appeal; Whether rejection of condonation of delay amounts to rejection of main proceedings; Appealability of the order under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962; Availability of alternative remedy by way of statutory appeal; Invocation of powers of judicial review.

Analysis:

1. Challenge to rejection of application for condonation of delay: The High Court considered a writ petition filed by the department challenging the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata, which rejected an application for condonation of delay in preferring an appeal. The court examined whether the rejection of such an application would amount to the rejection of the main proceedings as well.

2. Rejection of condonation of delay and main proceedings: Citing the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Shyam Sundar Sarma v. Pannalal Jaiswal, the High Court concluded that the rejection of an application for condonation of delay does indeed amount to the rejection of the main proceedings. The court highlighted that an appeal filed along with an application for condoning the delay, when dismissed for the delay, is considered a decision in the appeal itself.

3. Appealability under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962: The High Court determined that the order in question was appealable under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. It noted that the petitioners had an alternative remedy available through a statutory appeal, and therefore, the court did not find any grounds to exercise its powers of judicial review.

4. Availability of alternative remedy and judicial review: Based on the finding that an efficacious alternative remedy existed through a statutory appeal, the High Court dismissed the writ petition. The court emphasized that since the petitioners had the option of pursuing a statutory appeal, there was no justification for invoking the powers of judicial review in this case.

5. Costs: The High Court decided that there would be no order as to costs in this matter, indicating that no additional financial burden would be imposed on any party as a result of the dismissal of the writ petition.

In conclusion, the High Court's judgment upheld the rejection of the application for condonation of delay, emphasized the appealability of the order under the Customs Act, highlighted the availability of an alternative statutory remedy, and ultimately dismissed the writ petition without imposing any costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates