Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2011 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (8) TMI 839 - AT - Service TaxStay of Demand - Business Support Services - Business or profession - Sir Ganga Ram Hospital was providing infrastructural support to certain doctors who were allowed to hold private outpatient consultation in the hospital and was charging some amounts from those doctors. - this matter involves interpretation of law and the interpretation given by the High Court for the word business has to be given due weightage while interpreting the same word used in Finance Act, 1994. If the interpretation of the High Court is accepted, there is no scope for levying any Service Tax for the impugned activity of the Appellant - stay granted.
Issues:
1. Whether the Appellant should have paid Service Tax on charges for infrastructural support to doctors holding private outpatient consultations in the hospital? 2. Whether the support provided by the Appellant to doctors constitutes "Business Support Services" under the Finance Act, 1994? 3. Whether the activity of doctors in their premises should be classified as "professional service" or "business" for tax purposes? 4. Whether the interpretation of the term "business" by the High Court in a previous case should be considered in the current matter? Analysis: 1. The Appellant, a hospital, provided infrastructural support to doctors conducting private outpatient consultations in the hospital and charged amounts for the same. The Revenue contended that Service Tax should have been paid on these charges under the category of "Business Support Services." A tax demand of Rs. 30,55,586/- along with interest and penalties was confirmed by the impugned order, leading the Appellant to file an Appeal against it. 2. The Appellant argued that the doctors' activities in the hospital were "professional services" and not "business," thus the support provided should not be classified as "Business Support Services." They relied on a decision by the Gujarat High Court which held that the activities of doctors practicing their profession cannot be considered as "business." The Appellant sought to apply this interpretation to the current case. 3. The Departmental Representative contended that the term "business" has a broad meaning that encompasses professional activities as well. It was argued that the interpretation of "business" under the Income Tax Act should not be directly applied to the Finance Act, 1994. 4. The Tribunal considered the interpretation of the term "business" by the High Court in the previous case and acknowledged its relevance in the current matter. It was concluded that if the High Court's interpretation is accepted, there would be no basis for levying Service Tax on the Appellant's activities. Therefore, the Tribunal found that the Appellant had established a prima facie case for a total waiver of the dues arising from the impugned order, allowing for the admission of the Appeal. As a result, the pre-deposit of dues was waived, and there was a stay on the collection of such dues during the pendency of the Appeal.
|