|| New User || My profile || My Book Marks || SMS Services || Annual Subscription || Lost Password ||
Stay

TMI Database - Search

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
DOMAIN NAME IS ALSO A TRADE MARK - Article Cenvat Credit - Penalty - Input services received prior to 10.09.2004 - Scope of Rule 15 of CCR - Maximum penalty imposed equal to Rs. 2000/- - Tri Excess stock of stock found during search and seizure - redemption fine reduced from Rs.3 lakhs to Rs.1 lakh. - No personal penalty on partners and employees - Tri Sponsorship of cricket match - T-20 matches under the IPL banner - sports event - The appellant is immune to levy and collection of service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzn) of the Finance Act, 1994. - Tri Commercial training or coaching service - ICFAI - demand confirmed in view of Explanation added by the Finance Act, 2010 to Section 65(105)(zzc) of the Finance Act, 1994 with retrospective effect from 01/07/2003. - Tri Mining services / activities - composite contract - prima facie liable to service tax only from 1-6-2007 - Tri Claim of Duty drawback on goods and packing material perpetually - the petitioners cannot be stated to have exported a composite article. What the petitioners exported was the talcum powder simpliciter, of course in packed condition. - HC Expenditure owing to distribution of gifts to members/staff - expenditure allowed - Tri Deduction u/s 158BB(C)(1) - search - assessee did not maintain any books of accounts - not entitled to seek deduction - Tri Transfer - Building development agreement - The condition laid down u/s. 53A of Transfer of Property Act was not satisfied thus it cannot be said that there was a transfer u/s. 2(47)(v) - Tri Reopening of assessment - accommodation entries - nothing concrete was brought on record to substantiate that the assessee received any entry or made payment for accommodation entry - no addition - Tri Estimation of income of SJMI - PE - Procedure adopted by AO is not correct as there should be separate proceedings for two separate companies established in different countries. - Tri TP - where the lending of money was in foreign currency to its AE the domestic prime lending rate would have no applicability and the interbank rate fixed should be taken as benchmark - Tri Scrutiny / regular assessment - Validity of notice u/s.143(2) - year of selection was wrong and the notice served on assessee was issued prior to the actual approval by the JCIT - Notice bad in law - Tri Classification of the product Sugar Cone placed in Aluminium foil cone - sugar cone placed in the aluminium cone is properly classifiable under Chapter 19, as claimed by the appellant. - Tri Penalty - When the assessing authority, in its discretion has held that no penalty is leviable, by virtue of Section 80 of the Act, the revisionary authority cannot invoke its jurisdiction and impose penalty for the first time. - Tri Refund - Levy of Cess on import of coking and non-coking coal - The petitioners shall be entitled to refund of such duty paid only within three years immediately preceding the date of filing of the petition - HC Clandestine removal - allegation cannot be merely on the basis of presumptions and assumptions. Suspicion however grave cannot replace the proof - decided in favor of assessee by majority decision - Tri Swapping premium - Disallowance u/s 36(1)(viii) - swapping premium is nothing but discounted interest and had originated in the long term finance initially advance - deduction allowed - Tri    Left Stop Right

Please login.

Only paid members can access this page.

User Login
Username  
Password  
 
Stay sign in
 
 
 
New User / Registeration
Forget Password - Click here to retrieve your Password

 


2011 (11) TMI 503 - ITAT DELHI
Italian Thai Development Public Co. Ltd. Versus Assistant Director of Income-tax, Circle 1(2), New Delhi



TDS on upfront fees paid - Deduction u/s 40(a)(ia) dis-allowed - foreign company - liaison office in India – Held that:- Upfront fee of US$2 lakh paid to Standard Chartered Bank, Thailand to coordinate all agreement with it with tax on the said upfront fee to be borne by the assessee. US$ 2,00,000 equivalent to Rs. 89,34,000/- was grossed-up to the tune of Rs. 1,13,30,362/- out of which, a tax of Rs. 23,96,362/- was deducted and deposited by the assessee in the Government account. Thus payment of Rs. 23.96 lacs being amount of TDS and paid to the Government account for and on behalf of SCB, Bangkok is to be treated as a part of upfront fees paid by the assessee, and since the payment of Rs. 89.34 lacs is net of the taxes paid by the assessee has been allowed as a revenue deduction by the AO, the payment of Rs. 23.96 lacs being part of the same consideration shall also be eligible as a revenue deduction.

Similarly, the payment of Rs. 20,000/- towards bank charges for remitting the upfront fees from India to Thailand shall also be allowed as a revenue deduction – Decided in favor of assessee.


 

what is new what is new

Subscription UpdatesNewslettersCommunicationOther Options


Go To Top

Go to Mobile Website

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.