Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2013 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (12) TMI 352 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
Waiver of pre-deposit of interest and penalty for purchasing DEPB Scrip from the market obtained by another company, liability for penalty due to importing goods against DEPB Scrip obtained fraudulently, lack of finding of connivance with the company that obtained the DEPB Scrip fraudulently.

Analysis:
The applicant filed an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit of interest and penalty amounting to Rs.17,72,626. The contention put forth was that the DEPB Scrip was purchased from the market, originally obtained by another company, M/s. Rajat Pharmachem Ltd. It was alleged that the said company inflated the value of exported goods to acquire the DEPB Scrip, which was then sold to the applicant for import purposes. Notably, M/s. Rajat Pharma Ltd. admitted duty liability before the Settlement Commission and paid the duty. However, there was no finding in the impugned order indicating the applicant's connivance with M/s. Rajat Pharmachem Ltd. to obtain the DEPB Scrip. Therefore, the imposition of penalty was deemed unsustainable by the applicant.

The Revenue, on the other hand, relied on the lower authority's findings to argue that the applicant took undue advantage by importing goods against the DEPB Scrip acquired fraudulently, hence making the applicant liable for penalty. Upon reviewing the adjudication order, it was observed that there was no explicit finding suggesting the applicant's involvement in fraudulent activities with M/s. Rajat Pharmachem Ltd. regarding the DEPB Scrip. Given that the duty liability was admitted and paid by the said company without any evidence of connivance with the applicant, it was considered that the applicant had a strong case. Consequently, the Tribunal decided to waive the pre-deposit of interest and penalty, staying the recovery during the appeal's pendency.

In conclusion, the stay petition was allowed by the Tribunal, granting the applicant relief from the pre-deposit of interest and penalty during the ongoing appeal process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates