Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2015 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (1) TMI 818 - HC - Income TaxDeduction u/s 80IB(10) - Housing project which also had certain units exceeding the prescribed ceiling on the built up area, the profits from the other units can be worked out separately and allowed deduction u/s 80IB(10), subject to fulfilling other conditions prescribed under the said section - Held that - The Tribunal has taken a consistent view that if some of the flats are constructed in violation of the conditions of builtup area, then, the proportionate deduction will have to be reduced. Now, the proportionate deduction is available only when other conditions as regards the area of the plot is satisfied. The Tribunal applied the other condition, namely, project is on the size of the plot of a land which has a minimum area of one acre. Therefore, it does not affect the condition and section 80IB(10) benefit or deduction cannot be denied on that score. The Tribunal approved the finding of Commissioner of Income Tax. The Tribunal itself notes as to how the area crossed the limits only at the time of sale, that is, when the buyer requested the developer to alter the area and by either withdrawing or adding a portion from adjacent flats. The Developer adhered to the mandatory condition of the Construction not exceeding one thousand square feet whole completing the developmental work. In such circumstances, and when a finding rendered against the Assessee has been upheld by the Tribunal, then, all the more we do not see any substantial question of law. - Decided against revenue.
Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 80IB(10) in relation to housing project with units exceeding prescribed ceiling on built-up area. Analysis: The primary issue in this judgment revolves around the interpretation of section 80IB(10) concerning a housing project with units exceeding the prescribed ceiling on the built-up area. The question of law raised was whether profits from units exceeding the limit can be worked out separately and allowed deduction under section 80IB(10) if other conditions are met. The developer-assessee in this case had constructed two flats exceeding the one thousand sq. ft. limit within the city of Mumbai, which was a violation of the section. The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner held that the requirement under section 80IB(10) was not fulfilled due to this violation. The arguments presented by both sides focused on whether the constructed area of the flats exceeded the permissible limit and if such violation should disentitle the Assessee from claiming the deduction. The Tribunal's finding was crucial, as it concluded that although the area of the flats exceeded one thousand sq. ft. at the time of sale due to buyer's requests for alterations, the developer had adhered to the mandatory condition during construction. The Tribunal's consistent view was that if some flats were constructed in violation of the built-up area conditions, the deduction would have to be proportionately reduced. However, as long as other conditions, such as the size of the plot being a minimum of one acre, were satisfied, the benefit under section 80IB(10) could not be denied solely based on the violation of built-up area limits. The judgment also referenced previous cases where similar controversies had been addressed, emphasizing that the crucial date for determining compliance was when the construction was carried out and completed. The court held that in the absence of an appeal by the Assessee, the factual conclusions did not raise any substantial question of law. Additionally, the judgment addressed other questions related to the construction of commercial units exceeding limits, concluding that they did not disentitle the Assessee from claiming the deduction. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeal, stating that none of the questions raised qualified as substantial questions of law and no costs were awarded.
|