Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2015 (8) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (8) TMI 283 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURTDisallowance under section 36(1)(iii) - ITAT directing the AO to recompute the disallowance adopting the average cost of debt for the year - Held that:- As rightly held by the Tribunal, the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana vs. M/s Abhishek Industries, Ludhiana (2006 (8) TMI 123 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court )as relied upon by AO does not deal with the question of the rate of interest to be applied in cases where the assessee has mixed funds available with it. We agree with the Tribunal's view that where mixed funds are diverted towards interest free advances the disallowance should be made up to the level of the average cost of debt to the assessee. There is no justification in taking into consideration the rate of interest in respect of any particular transaction whereunder an assessee avails advances on interest. An assessee may avail several advances from the same lender or from different lenders and at varying rates of interest. In the absence of anything to indicate that the interest free advance was made only from a particular corresponding advance received by the assessee, the advance made by the assessee would obviously be from the common pool of money. Money lying in a common pool has no identity. The various amounts advanced to the assessee get merged into a common pool. There is no justification then either for the assessee or for the department to take into consideration the rate of interest in respect of a particular advance or advances to the assessee. The only logical approach is to take into consideration the average interest rate at which the assessee has availed of the advances. - Decided in favour of assessee.
|