Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2015 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (9) TMI 759 - CESTAT NEW DELHIValidity of appeal - Authorization of Committee of Commissioner - one Member of the Committee has authenticated the order - absence of date under signature - Held that:- Revenue is not preferred to be non-suiter to protect interest of Revenue. But the casual approach of the Revenue makes it remediless by the review order of the aforesaid nature. Such negligence of Revenue were before Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the case of C.C.E., Delhi-III vs. B.E. Office Automation Products Pvt. Ltd. reported in [2009 (12) TMI 128 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA] and also before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CCE, Delhi-I vs. Kundalia Industries reported in [2012 (8) TMI 789 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - Decided against Revenue.
|