Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (8) TMI 1398 - CESTAT NEW DELHIRectification of Mistake application - Ms. Neha Garg, the Ld. Counsel submits that the entire order is against the assessee but somehow in concluding para 7 it is mentioned that the “appeal is allowed” - Held that:- In view of above in para 7 we insert the word ‘not’. After inserting the word ‘not’ it will be read as “In the result, the appeal is not allowed” - ROM allowed. ROM application - appellants submits that the submissions made by the appellants were not considered by the Tribunal and the same are not reflecting in the impugned order - Held that:- It is not necessary to impede each and every argument of the appellant. Only the cumulative effect will have to mention in the order - Also, In the name of ROM, review of the appeal is not permissible - ROM dismissed.
|