Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2019 (4) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (4) TMI 1735 - SUPREME COURTGrant of pensionary benefits - treating respondent (employee) as a regular employee - whether the High Court was justified in allowing the respondent's writ petition in part and was, therefore, justified in issuing the direction now impugned in this appeal by the State? - HELD THAT:- We are constrained to allow this appeal, set aside the impugned order and remand the case to the High Court for deciding the respondent's writ petition afresh on merits in accordance with law. The need to remand the case to the High Court has occasioned because from the perusal of the impugned order, we find that it is an unreasoned order. In other words, the High Court neither discussed the issues arising in the case, nor dealt with any of the submissions urged by the parties and nor assigned any reason as to why it has allowed the writ petition and granted the reliefs to the writ petitioner which were declined by the Tribunal - This Court has consistently laid down that every judicial or/and quasijudicial order passed by the Court/Tribunal/Authority concerned, which decides the lis between the parties, must be supported with the reasons in support of its conclusion. The case is remanded to the High Court for deciding the writ petition afresh, out of which this appeal arises, for its disposal in accordance with law.
|