Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (7) TMI 1518 - ITAT KOLKATAAddition on account of leave encashment - HELD THAT:- The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. [2009 (5) TMI 894 - SC ORDER] granted stay against the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of Exide Industries Ltd. [2007 (6) TMI 175 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] until further orders vide order dated 08.09.2008. Further, during the pendency of Civil appeal the Hon’ble Supreme Court was pleased to direct assessee therein to pay tax as if section 43B(f) is on the Statute Book though it would be entitled to make claim in the return vide order dated 08.05.2009. Keeping in view of the above orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court, on similar cases, this Tribunal is remanding the matter to the file of Assessing Officer to decide afresh after awaiting final order of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Exide Industries Ltd. (supra). We find this Tribunal in assessee’s own case remanded the similar issues from Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2011-12 which are placed and respectfully following the same, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of Assessing Officer for his fresh consideration taking into account final order of Hon’ble Supreme Court. Thus only ground raised by the assessee in this appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Addition made u/s 80IA - HELD THAT:- As decided in assessee's own case similar claim of the assessee for deduction under section 80IA in respect of captive power units has been allowed by the Tribunal relying on the various judicial pronouncements as well as the CBDT Instruction No. 1116. Respectfully following the said decision of the Coordinate Bench, we uphold the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) allowing the claim of the assessee for deduction under section 80IA on Captive Power Unit. Disallowance made on account of capital investment subsidy and sales tax remission - HELD THAT:- As in assessee’s own case for A.Ys. 2003-04 and 2004-05 wherein the similar amount of incentive received by the assessee-company under the same scheme of West Bengal Government has been held to be capital in nature not chargeable to tax. Disallowance made u/s 14A - HELD THAT:- In the absence of any exempt income, disallowance under Section 14A of the Act of any amount was not permissible.
|