Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2017 (7) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (7) TMI 1356 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURTGrant of Anticipatory Bail - contention is that the petitioners have not appeared before the Investigating Officer and they did not appear before the Court as such the Court has issued arrest warrant against the petitioners and since arrest warrants have been issued - HELD THAT:- The question of maintainability of bail application after issuance of warrant of arrest was considered by the Division Bench of this Court in Nand Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 1979 RLW 477 [1979 (7) TMI 253 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] and the High Court has held that anticipatory bail is maintainable even though the Magistrate has taken cognizance and has issued warrant of arrest against the accused. As far as the present case is concerned, co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail, petitioners Gopal Mittal and Mahesh Mittal, who have supplied the medicine in accordance with the work order. As per the case of the prosecution the total loss caused to the Government by purchase of medicine is to the tune of ₹ 2,12,000/-. It is deemed proper to allow the application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners - Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed.
|