Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (11) TMI 1949 - AT - Central ExciseCENVAT credit - inputs/capital goods/input services - appellant used generated electricity for its own captive consumption as well as sold electricity to the Grid as per the contractual norms - common input for taxable as well as exempt goods - denial of credit only on the ground that Cenvat Credit statute specifically permits utilization of electricity for manufacture of the final product - Rule 3, 6 (5) and Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - HELD THAT - The appellant had reflected the percentage of electricity consumed within the factory and that wheeled out to Grid against receipt of monetary consideration. However, since such certificate was produced by the appellant after adjudication of the matter, the original authority should verify the certificate alongwith the statement produced before the Tribunal, for ascertaining the fact, whether the percentage of generated electricity reflected in the statement were actually sold to the Grid. For arriving at the conclusion regarding captive consumption of generated electricity and that sold out to grid, the appellant should produce adequate records to demonstrate such factual aspects - On verification of the documents, if the original authority is satisfied that the quantum of electricity generated were captively used by the appellant for manufacture of the final product, the Cenvat benefit on such quantum of electricity should be made available to the appellant. Appeal allowed by way of remand.
Issues:
1. Denial of Cenvat credit for electricity used for captive consumption and sold to the Grid. 2. Adjudication of Cenvat demand, penalty imposition, and subsequent appeal. Analysis: 1. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing Sponge Irons and M.S. Billets, availed Cenvat credit for Central Excise duty and Service Tax paid on input and capital goods. The dispute arose when the Department initiated proceedings against the appellant for denial of Cenvat benefit on electricity used for captive consumption and sold to the Grid. The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the Cenvat demand but dropped the penalty. The appellant argued that electricity used for manufacturing final products should not be denied Cenvat Credit as permitted by the statute. 2. During the hearing, the appellant submitted a detailed letter and statement to the Jurisdictional Superintendent, outlining the consumption of electricity within the factory and wheeled out to the Grid. The appellant reversed the proportionate credit for electricity sold to the Grid and paid due interest. The Revenue, represented by the DR, stood by the findings of the impugned order. The Tribunal, upon reviewing the appellant's submission, directed the original authority to verify the documents provided by the appellant, especially the percentage of electricity consumed within the factory and sold to the Grid. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adequate records to demonstrate the captive consumption of electricity and the accuracy of the information presented. If satisfied, the original authority should grant the Cenvat benefit accordingly. 3. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for further verification and assessment based on the documents and records submitted by the appellant. The decision aimed to ensure a fair and accurate determination of the Cenvat benefit concerning the electricity consumed for captive use and sold to the Grid. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper verification and record-keeping in such matters to uphold the statutory provisions and principles governing Cenvat credit.
|