Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2019 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (8) TMI 1823 - HC - Customs


Issues: Challenge of seizure of Gold Bars and confiscation order; Lack of opportunity during confiscation order; Request for remanding the matter for reconsideration.

In this case, the petitioner challenged the seizure of 15.160 kg of Gold Bars and the subsequent confiscation order. The main contention raised was the lack of opportunity provided during the confiscation order process. The petitioner's counsel argued that no opportunity was given for a hearing before the confiscation order was passed, seeking a remand for reconsideration to extend such an opportunity.

The respondent's counsel contended that sufficient opportunities were indeed extended to the petitioner, but the petitioner failed to avail them. The Order in Original revealed that the petitioner's authorized representative had requested adjournments during the personal hearings granted on multiple occasions, eventually leading to the passing of the impugned order due to the petitioner's non-appearance and failure to file a written reply.

Upon examining the facts, the Court noted that despite opportunities being granted, the petitioner did not cooperate with the adjudication process. However, considering the mention of the pending Writ Petition before the Court in the representative's letter, the Court acknowledged the petitioner's difficulty in responding in time due to the ongoing legal proceedings.

The Court decided to set aside the Order in Original and remand the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was given 30 days to file objections, and the respondent was directed to dispose of the objections within three months thereafter, emphasizing a fair opportunity for the petitioner to substantiate their claim. The Court concluded the Writ Petition without imposing any costs, aiming to ensure the ends of justice were met through a more equitable process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates