Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (1) TMI 303 - CESTAT MUMBAIContention of revenue is that Commissioner (Appeals) could not have reduced the mandatory penalty imposed under Sec.11AC – since duty amount has been deposited with interest before issue of SCN, so equal amount of penalty is not imposable under Rule 25 read with Sec.11AC - impugned order reducing the penalty under the provisions of Rule 25 read with Sec.11AC is correct and does not require any interference – revenue’s appeal rejected
|