Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + Commission Indian Laws - 2019 (3) TMI Commission This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (3) TMI 2000 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONPay fixation as per the recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission not resolved - delayed transfer of his RTI application from the Head Office to Zonal Accounts Office, Shimla/ Patiala - circular issued by Ministry of Finance / DOE dated 30.08.2008 had not been furnished fully - HELD THAT:- The Commission observed that the framework of the RTI Act, 2005 restricts the jurisdiction of the Commission to provide a ruling on the issues pertaining to access/ right to information and to venture into the merits of a case or redressal of grievance. The Commission in a plethora of decisions including Shri Vikram Singh v. Delhi Police, North East District, [2012 (2) TMI 723 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION], Sh. Triveni Prasad Bahuguna vs. LIC of India, Lucknow [2012 (9) TMI 1229 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION], Mr. H. K. Bansal vs. CPIO & GM (OP), [2013 (1) TMI 1043 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION] had held that RTI Act was not the proper law for redressal of grievances/disputes. Keeping in view the facts of the case and the submissions made by both the parties, no further intervention of the Commission is required in the matter. However, a copy of the OM issued by the MoF dated 30.08.2008 be furnished to the Appellant within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order, free of cost. For redressal of his grievance, the Appellant is advised to approach an appropriate forum. Appeal disposed off.
|