Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (6) TMI 102 - CESTAT, CHENNAIAppellant reversed credit on objection of department which they took of tax paid on GTA service for outward transportation of its final products - demand of interest affirmed for the period between availment of credit and the reversal of the same - held that the impugned service was covered by definition of ‘input service’ and that the assessee could utilize the credit for payment of service tax due. It is argued that the impugned demand of interest is not therefore sustainable – stay granted
|