Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (3) TMI 275 - AT - Central ExciseAvailability of benefit of Notification No. 64/95-C.E., dated 16-3-95, Sr. No. 3 of which allows exemption to the goods, if supplied as Stores for consumption on board a vessel of the Indian Navy or Coast Guard revenue denying benefit on the ground that MS plates and sheets cleared during the period not to be considered as Stores in view of Board s Circular No. 89/88-CX.6, dt. 30-12-88, exemption cannot be denied
Issues:
Availability of benefit of Notification No. 64/95-C.E. for goods supplied as Stores for consumption on board a vessel of the Indian Navy or Coast Guard. Analysis: The issue in the present appeal pertains to the availability of benefit under Notification No. 64/95-C.E., which exempts goods supplied as Stores for consumption on board a vessel of the Indian Navy or Coast Guard upon production of a certificate from the proper officer of the Indian Navy. The appellant produced the required certificate, but the benefit was denied on the grounds that the plates and sheets cleared by the appellant could not be considered as "Stores" as they were used for repairs of warships and were deemed raw material, not covered by the term "Stores". The Tribunal referred to previous decisions, notably the case of Goa Paints & Allied Products v. CCE, Goa, affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, and the case of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. v. Collector of C. Ex., Cochin. The Tribunal emphasized that a restrictive meaning should not be given to the term "Stores" and "Consumption." It highlighted that the term "Stores" should encompass goods of a particular kind or purpose, including equipment, and not limited to items consumed by humans. The definition of "consumption" was also elaborated, emphasizing that even items with a long life can be considered consumed if used in the vessel. Additionally, the Board's Circular No. 89/88-CX.6 clarified that the expression "Stores" for consumption on board a vessel includes both consumable and non-consumable stores for the use of the ship and crew members. The term "consumption" in Central Excise denotes "use," covering stores meant for the vessel and crew members. The definition of "stores" in Section 2(38) of the Customs Act, 1962, was also referenced to support this interpretation. Given the comprehensive analysis and precedents cited, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, as the issue was deemed to be adequately covered by existing legal interpretations and definitions. (Pronounced in Court)
|