Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (1) TMI 83 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT
AO on basis of seized document made additions u/s 69 as un-identified investment – there was sufficient material before the A.O. to have made additions – I.T.A.T. by elaborate reasoning has also held that the presumption created by the document had not been rebutted nor had the assessee denied the loan amount - no infirmity in tribunal’s order – contention raised at the appellate stage was merely an attempt to create doubts in the mind of court – no violation of principle of natural justice