Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (2) TMI 389 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURTImposition of penalty on Director - At the time of framing the charge, it cannot be said that there is a strict onus on the part of the prosecution to prove that the petitioner in no way was connected with the affairs of the company - Simply because at the pre-charge stage, no evidence has come, prosecution cannot be precluded to improve its case – U/S 9(c) of CEA, mental state on the part of the accused is to be presumed and there shall be a defence known to each accused to prove that there was no such mental state – petition dismissed
|