Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2018 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (5) TMI 1040 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Appeals against orders-in-appeal involving passing of ineligible CENVAT credit, confiscation of goods, imposition of penalties, and applicability of Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Passing of Ineligible CENVAT Credit:
The appeals revolved around M/s Sunrise Metal Corporation and M/s Prathmesh Steel being charged with issuing invoices without accompanying the goods, leading to the passing of ineligible CENVAT credit to M/s Harisons Steel Ltd. The adjudicating authority found them guilty of assisting in availing such credit fraudulently. The counsel argued that penalties should not apply as the ineligible credit transfer did not occur, and confiscation was unjustified as the bazaar scrap seized was not concealing any goods. The tribunal upheld the penalties on the firms under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, emphasizing the contravention by issuing invoices without accompanying goods, but reduced the penalties imposed.

Imposition of Penalties:
The tribunal found that the partnership firms had indeed issued invoices without the physical movement of goods as indicated, supporting the penalties imposed. It noted discrepancies in the goods described in the documents and those found in the vehicle, leading to the correct invocation of penal provisions. While reducing the penalties on M/s Sunrise Metal Corporation and M/s Prathmesh Steel, the tribunal upheld the penalties as justified, considering the interest of justice.

Confiscation of Goods:
Regarding the confiscation of goods, the tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities, ruling that Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962 applies only when seized goods are used to conceal smuggled items. As the seized local scrap was not concealing any goods, the confiscation was deemed unsustainable. The tribunal set aside the confiscation orders for M/s Sunrise Metal Corporation and M/s Prathmesh Steel, thereby eliminating the question of redemption fine.

In conclusion, the tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and emphasizing the importance of justice in determining penalties and confiscation matters related to passing ineligible CENVAT credit and the applicability of relevant legal provisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates