Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2019 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (3) TMI 445 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Availment of common input services for taxable services and trading activities.
2. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit and imposition of penalties under Cenvat Credit Rules and Finance Act.
3. Reversal of Cenvat Credit and interest demand.
4. Verification of Cenvat account balance and reversal particulars.
5. Imposition of penalty under Rule 15(3) of the Rules.

Analysis:
1. The appellant availed common input services for both taxable services and trading activities during the disputed period. The department disputed the availment of such common input services, leading to show cause proceedings and an adjudication order disallowing Cenvat Credit amounting to ?4,72,821. The appellant appealed, and the Commissioner (Appeals) modified the order, reducing the disallowance to ?1,71,491 and the penalty under Rule 15(3) to ?1,47,491. The penalty under Rule 15(1) was set aside. The appellant challenged this order before the Tribunal.

2. The Tribunal considered the appellant's contention that it had reversed proportionate Cenvat Credit for the input services used for both output services and trading activities. However, upon review, it was found that the reversal was not in conformity with Rule 6 of the Rules. Therefore, the denial of Cenvat benefit in the adjudication order was deemed proper. Regarding interest demand, the Tribunal noted the amendment to Rule 14, stipulating that unless Cenvat Credit was utilized for service tax payment on output services, interest demand could not be imposed. The matter was referred back to the original authority for verification of reversal particulars and Cenvat account balance during the disputed period.

3. The Tribunal also addressed the imposition of penalties on the appellant. It was observed that the provisions of Rule 15(3) of the Rules read with Section 78 of the Act could not be invoked without elements of suppression or misstatement by the appellant to defraud government revenue. As no such elements were found, the penalty imposed was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.

4. In conclusion, the Tribunal disposed of the appeal by setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(3) of the Rules and allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. The matter was referred back to the original authority for further fact-finding regarding the payment of interest by the appellant in accordance with the provisions of both unamended and amended Rule 14 of the rules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates