Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2019 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (5) TMI 1232 - AT - Service TaxDemand of Service tax - short term accommodation services - the contention of the appellant in respect of the same was that the tariff was less than ₹ 1,000/- per room per day in respect of the said services and there were exemption under N/N. 31/2011 dated 25th April, 2011 for tariff billow ₹ 1,000/- and exemption resulted in nil rate of duty - HELD THAT - The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has not rejected the ledgers maintained. Further, learned Commissioner (Appeals) should have verified the said ledgers vouchers and satisfied himself than believe in the information available on the website. The said observation are unsustainable in the absence of any credible evidence relied upon by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
Issues:
Confirmation of service tax demand for financial years 2012-13 and 2013-14 in relation to short term accommodation services provided by the appellant. Analysis: The Appellate Tribunal, after hearing both sides, noted the appellant's grievance regarding the service tax demand. The appellant contended that the tariff for the accommodation service was below the threshold of &8377; 1,000 per room per day, making them eligible for exemption under Notification No. 31/2011, resulting in a nil rate of duty. However, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) did not accept this contention, stating that the Department had conducted a thorough investigation and found the tariffs recorded on the website, contrary to the entries in the appellant's ledger. The Tribunal observed that the Commissioner did not reject the ledgers maintained by the appellant and should have verified them along with the vouchers before relying solely on the information available on the website. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the Commissioner's observations were unsustainable due to the lack of credible evidence and set aside the order demanding the service tax amounts for the specified financial years along with interest and penalty. In conclusion, the appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, emphasizing the importance of verifying the appellant's ledgers and vouchers before making decisions based solely on external information. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of credible evidence to support any findings or conclusions in such matters, ensuring a fair and just adjudication process.
|