Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (8) TMI 595 - ITAT MUMBAIReopening of assessment u/s 147 - deduction u/s 57 disallowed - HELD THAT:- AO had passed the original assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act in which he allowed the deduction under section 57 - all the facts pertaining to the transaction of Idea Shares were available before the AO when he passed the original assessment Order u/s 143(3). After the original assessment, the AO did not find any fresh information/material in respect of the transaction of purchase/ sale of the Idea Shares. This is evident from the reasons recorded by the AO. Yet, the AO re-opened the assessment under section 147 and disallowed the said interest expense claimed under section 57. In the original assessment proceedings AO has considered the aspect interest expenses and considered in the body of assessment order as well as in the computation of income specifically and after considering the same, the AO allowed the interest expenses. AO has applied his mind and formed an opinion for allowance of this interest expenses while framing original assessment. Now, reopening on the very same issue tantamount to change of opinion which is not permissible in law. Asian Paints Ltd. vs. DCIT [2008 (7) TMI 237 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] has been held that the initiation of reassessment proceedings would amount to change of opinion of the AO as it was merely a fresh application of mind by the AO to the same set of facts and that since the AO had failed to apply his mind to the relevant material while framing the assessment order under section 143(3), he could not take advantage of his own wrong and reopen the assessment under section 147 - This was the case where the AO had reopened the assessment within four years from the end of the Assessment Year under appeal. Even in the case of in the case of Legato Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd.[2009 (9) TMI 943 - DELHI HIGH COURT] has held that proceedings under section 147/148 of the Act vis-à-vis completed assessments cannot be reopened, on a mere change of opinion i.e. on the basis of the same set of facts and material which were in the knowledge of the AO, and that the proceedings for reopening of assessment on the ground of income escaping assessment is an exception to the finality of the proceedings arrived at under Section 143(3) of the Act during the regular assessment proceedings of the assessment years. Notice u/s. 148 of the Act was issued on the ground that there was reason to believe that income had escaped assessment, there was neither any change of law nor had any new material been brought on record between the date of the assessment order and the date of formation of opinion by the AO. It was merely a fresh application of mind by the officer to the same set of facts and the reassessment proceedings initiated based on the change of the opinion of the officer is bad in law. This was the case where the AO had reopened the assessment within four years from the end of the Assessment year. Hence, the reasons recorded for reopening reflect a mere change in the opinion by the AO. Accordingly, we quash the reopening and allow the jurisdictional issue in favour of the assessee.
|