Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2020 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (10) TMI 196 - HC - GST


Issues involved:
Challenge to order under Section 107(1) of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged an order imposing tax liability, interest, and penalty. The petitioner contended that despite submitting returns on time, a technical error showed a zero return, promptly rectified. The petitioner emphasized their good faith by immediately paying the balance due with subsequent returns. The petitioner argued that the authorities failed to consider entitled tax credits, affecting interest and penalty calculations. The appellate authority's order did not address these key points, prompting the petitioner's challenge.

The Additional Advocate General argued that the appellate authority's order was self-explanatory regarding the petitioner's liability. Notably, the petitioner did not participate during the hearing, limiting their ability to raise issues later. However, the court observed that the appellate authority mainly focused on factual aspects, statutory provisions, and timelines, neglecting the petitioner's specific objections and grounds from the appeal memo.

The court emphasized that the appellate authority must consider and address all grounds of challenge, providing a reasoned order. Citing legal precedent, the court stressed that arbitrary orders lacking proper reasoning are legally unsustainable. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order, remitting the matter back to the appellate authority for a fresh decision, instructing a thorough consideration of the petitioner's raised grounds and granting the petitioner another hearing opportunity.

In conclusion, the court partially allowed the writ petition, directing a fresh consideration of the appeal with proper adherence to legal principles, emphasizing the importance of reasoned orders and due application of mind by authorities.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates