Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2008 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (1) TMI 102 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIAppellants had agreement with Bank to promote their retail activities – there is no force in contention of appellants that they are not providing any business auxiliary service, and they are under the franchise agreement with Bank - conditions of the agreement shows that appellants has to promote retail finance of bank - appellants are not paying to bank any amount being their franchise - even, they are getting commission from bank – impugned services coverable under business auxiliary service
|