Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2021 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (10) TMI 199 - HC - GSTConfiscation of goods alongwith conveyance - Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - HELD THAT - Counsel submits that the petitioner filed the appeal in terms of directions passed by this Court before the appellate authority. Second appeal is provided under the Act before the Tribunal which has not been constituted as yet. Issue notice to the respondent(s), returnable on 08.11.2021 - Meanwhile, it is directed that if the petitioner fulfills the conditions laid down under Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rules of 2017, the respondents shall release the goods provisionally subject to the final outcome of the writ petition.
Issues:
1. Opportunity for depositing tax and penalty before confiscation of goods. 2. Provisional release of goods under Rule 140(1) of CGST Rules. 3. Availability of appeal for redressal of grievances. Analysis: Issue 1: The petitioner challenged the confiscation of goods without being given an opportunity to deposit the tax and penalty demanded. The court noted that the petitioner was not provided with the requisite 14-day period to make the payment before the final order of confiscation was passed. The court emphasized that under Section 129, there should be a chance for provisional release of goods before any decision under Section 130 is made. The court directed that the petitioner should be given a chance to avail provisional release under Rule 140(1) if the conditions are fulfilled. Issue 2: The court observed that the petitioner had the right to challenge the order of confiscation before the Appellate Authority. It directed that if the petitioner meets the conditions of Rule 140(1) of CGST Rules, the goods should be provisionally released by the respondents, pending the final outcome of the appeal. The court also instructed that the Bank Guarantee submitted by the petitioner should not be encashed until the appeal is finally disposed of. Issue 3: The petitioner had filed an appeal as per the court's directions, but the second appeal to the Tribunal was not possible as it had not been constituted yet. The court issued notice to the respondent(s) to appear on a specified date. In the meantime, it directed the provisional release of goods if the petitioner fulfills the conditions of Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rules, with the Bank Guarantee not to be encashed until the final disposal of the writ petition. The court emphasized the importance of the Appellate Authority deciding the appeal promptly, preferably within two months.
|