Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + NAPA GST - 2022 (8) TMI NAPA This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (8) TMI 95 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITYProfiteering - Purchase of flat - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price - contravention of of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 - penalty - HELD THAT:- It Is clear from a plain reading of Section 171 (1) that it deals with two situations:- one relating to the passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax and the second about the passing on the benefit of the ITC. On the issue of reduction in the tax rate, it is apparent from the DGAP's Report that there has been no reduction in the rate of tax in the post-GST period; hence the only issue to be examined is whether there was any benefit of ITC with the introduction of GST. On this issue, it has been revealed from the DGAP's Report that the ITC as a percentage of the turnover that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April 201.6 to June 2017) was 3.31% and during the post-GST period (July 2017 to April-2020), It was 5.42% for the Project 'The Peaceful Homes'. This confirms that post-GST, the Respondent has benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 2.11% (5.42% - 3.31%) of his turnover, and the same was required to be passed on to the customers/flat buyers/recipients, The DGAP has calculated the amount of ITC benefit availed by the Respondent which needs to be passed on to all the recipients of supply Including the Applicant No. 1 as Rs. 3,52,59,318/-. The details of such calculations are mentioned in Table- B supra. The above amount is Inclusive of profiteered amount of Rs. 48,952/- In respect of the Applicant No. 1. The Authority finds that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 3,52,59,318/- during the period of investigation i.e. July 2017 to April 2020. The above amount that has been profiteered by the Respondent from his home buyers shall be refunded by him, along with interest @ 18% thereon, from the date when the above amount was profiteered by him till the date of such payment, in line with the provisions of Rule 133 (3) (b) of the CGST Rules 2017 - This Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017 orders that the Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him. Interest - HELD THAT:- The Respondent is also liable to pay interest as applicable on the entire amount profiteered, i.e. Rs. 3,52,59,318/- Hence the Respondent is directed to also pass on Interest @ 18% to the customers/ flat buyers/ recipients on the entire amount profiteered, starting from the date from which the above amount was profiteered till the date of passing on/ payment, as per provisions of Rule 133 (3) (b) of the CGST Rules 2017. Penalty - HELD THAT:- It Is also evident from the above narration of facts that the Respondent has denied the benefit of ITC to his home buyers in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has committed an offence under Section 171. (3A) of above Act. That Section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017 has been inserted in the CGST Act, 2017 vide Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2019, and the same became operational w.e.f. 01.01.2020. As the period of investigation was July 2017 to April 2020, therefore, the Respondent is liable for imposition of penalty under the provisions of the above Section for the amount profiteered from 01.01.2020 onwards. This Order having been passed today falls within the limitation prescribed under Rule 133(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
|