Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + SC Central Excise - 1993 (3) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1993 (3) TMI 106 - SUPREME COURTWhether under the Land Acquisition Act and public purpose is required to be specified in the notification with particularity and the specification should not be vague? Held that:- The notification in the present case specifically provides that the land was being acquired for the purpose of "development plan and construction of residential, commercial and administrative buildings". The Division Bench of the High Court has, after discussing the material on the record in detail, found as a fact that ample opportunity of hearing was given to Bhawani Singh by the Officer-on-Special Duty who heard the objections. The High Court further found that the objections filed by the Samiti Were fully considered by the said officer. We find no infirmity in the findings of the High Court and agree with the same. Appeal dismissed.
|