Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + HC Money Laundering - 2023 (5) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (5) TMI 1158 - DELHI HIGH COURTPresence of Advocate during Enquiry/interrogation as a matter of right - petitioner submits that as of now the investigation has been completed and the prosecution complaint has also been filed - HELD THAT:- In view of the fact that the investigation has already completed and the respondent has chosen not to come forward to contest the same. There is no impediment in confirming the order in DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT VERSUS SATYENDAR KUMAR JAIN [2022 (6) TMI 382 - DELHI HIGH COURT] granting permission that “during the time of enquiry/interrogation from the accused, one Advocate of the accused shall be allowed to remain present at a safe distance where from where he can see the accused but not hear him”. The petition is allowed in terms of order in DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT VERSUS SATYENDAR KUMAR JAIN [2022 (6) TMI 382 - DELHI HIGH COURT].
|