Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (2) TMI 453 - AT - Income TaxIncome deemed to accrue or arise in India - revenue earned by the assessee from the provisions of transmission services of voice, data and programmes of space segment capacity on Satellites to customers - AO held it in the nature of “Royalty” u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and Article 12(4) of the India-Netherland DTAA - Alternatively, he held that the revenue earned by the assessee is “Fee for Technical Services” u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Act r.w. Article 12(5) of the India- Netherlands DTAA. HELD THAT:- As in earlier years, Hon’ble Delhi High Court [2016 (2) TMI 415 - DELHI HIGH COURT] answered the questions in favour of the assessee held that India's change in position to the OECD Commentary cannot be a fact that influences the interpretation of the words defining royalty as they stand today. The only manner in which such change in position can be relevant is if such change is incorporated into the agreement itself and not otherwise. A change in executive position cannot bring about a unilateral legislative amendment into a treaty concluded between two sovereign states. It is fallacious to assume that any change made to domestic law to rectify a situation of mistaken interpretation can spontaneously further their case in an international treaty. Therefore, mere amendment to Section 9(1)(vi) cannot result in a change. Consequently, since we have held that the Finance Act, 2012 will not affect Article 12 of the DTAAs, it would follow that the first determinative interpretation given to the word "royalty" in Asia Satellite [2011 (1) TMI 47 - DELHI HIGH COURT] when the definitions were in fact pari materia (in the absence of any contouring explanations), will continue to hold the field for the purpose of assessment years preceding the Finance Act, 2012 and in all cases which involve a Double Tax Avoidance Agreement, unless the said DTAAs are amended jointly by both parties to incorporate income from data transmission services as partaking of the nature of royalty, or amend the definition in a manner so that such income automatically becomes royalty. The Revenue has not pointed any change into facts and circumstances of the present case. We therefore, respectfully following binding precedent (supra), hereby direct the AO to delete the impugned addition. Non granting credit of taxes as deducted at source - As assessee submitted that appropriate direction may be given to the assessing authority for granting credit of the tax already deducted and CIT DR has no objection in this regard - HELD THAT:- Considering the submissions made at bar, we direct the AO to verify the correctness of the claim of the assessee and give credit of the tax deducted at source in accordance with law. If the taxes have been deducted and deposited in government account as per provision of law, the AO would grant credit of same. This Ground of assessee’s appeal is allowed.
|