Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (3) TMI 348 - AT - Service Tax


Issues involved:
The issues involved in this case are the liability of the appellant to pay Service Tax for a Works Contract undertaken for a government body, the subsequent refund claim for excess Service Tax paid, the interest liability, and the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Liability to pay Service Tax and refund claim:
The Appellant undertook a Works Contract for Tripura Housing and Construction Board, believing that as a government body, no Service Tax was applicable. Upon being informed by the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner, they paid Rs. 18,47,186/- towards Service Tax. Subsequently, they realized they were only required to pay 50% of the Service Tax as a proprietary firm, leading to an excess payment of Rs. 7,96,757/-. A refund claim for this amount was initially rejected but later allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and subsequently granted by the Adjudicating Authority.

Interest liability and penalty under Section 78:
A Show Cause Notice was issued seeking to appropriate the amount paid and impose interest and penalty. The Appellant contended that they had already paid the excess Service Tax before the notice was issued and calculated the interest liability at Rs. 94,462/-. However, the Adjudicating Authority directed payment of Rs. 10,49,587/- towards interest and imposed a penalty under Section 78. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision. The Appellant argued that the interest and penalty were wrongly imposed, presenting a revised interest calculation of Rs. 2,24,600/- and requesting the penalty to be set aside.

Judgment:
The Tribunal acknowledged that the Appellant promptly paid the Service Tax upon notification, even though they had overpaid due to misunderstanding the applicable rate. The Tribunal noted that the Appellant had paid the excess Service Tax before the Show Cause Notice was issued and had also paid interest in advance. The Tribunal found the interest payable to be Rs. 130,138/-, considering the Appellant's turnover and the interest calculation provided. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside, as the Appellant's actions were deemed to be in good faith without intent to suppress information. The Tribunal directed the Appellant to pay the balance interest amount by a specified date and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates