Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2024 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (3) TMI 760 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
The issue involves the Adjudicating Authority permitting the rejoinder to be taken on record after the conclusion of the hearing of the Financial Creditor without prior liberty sought for filing the rejoinder.

Summary:

The Appellate Tribunal, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, heard the appeal against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, allowing the rejoinder to be taken on record upon payment of a cost of Rs.10,000. The Appellant challenged this decision, arguing that the rejoinder was filed after the conclusion of the Financial Creditor's hearing without prior permission. The Tribunal considered the submissions and the record.

The Adjudicating Authority justified its decision by stating that although the rejoinder should have been filed before the commencement of arguments, due to circumstances where the earlier lawyer failed to file it, the Financial Creditor changed its lawyer to contest the case further. The Adjudicating Authority believed that the Financial Creditor should not suffer due to the lawyer's lapse and allowed the rejoinder to be taken on record, noting that it would not prejudice the Corporate Debtor's plea of limitation.

The Tribunal, after reviewing the situation, upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to allow the rejoinder on record upon payment of the specified cost. It emphasized that while pleadings are typically completed before the hearing begins, in this case, the rejoinder was accepted during the hearing. The Tribunal concluded that there was no rule preventing such action by the Adjudicating Authority and decided not to entertain the appeal. However, it granted the Appellant an opportunity to make submissions regarding the rejoinder. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed with these observations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates