Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2006 (9) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (9) TMI 192 - HIGH COURT OF DELHIExtract: .......nsidered as a Pujari, and not the manufacturer, then his financial hardship would become obvious. We are unable to agree. If the corporate veil is lifted the persons who are in actual control of Amar Jyoti Packers will have to pay the impugned demand. No grounds to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are made out. 2. Dismissed.
|