Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2000 (8) TMI AT This
Issues:
1. Valuation dispute regarding Men's Exclusive Woven Trousers 2. Allegation of over-invoicing by Customs 3. Commissioner's findings on poor fabric quality and poor stitching 4. Confiscation of goods, redemption on payment of fine, and penalty imposition 5. Possibility of over-invoicing in export consignments 6. Government schemes permitting over-invoicing to a certain extent 7. Margin of profit alleged in Departmental enquiries 8. Lack of expert opinion in valuation of trousers 9. Reasonableness of price variation in export and import goods 10. Refusal of exporter to admit over-invoicing Analysis: 1. The case involved a dispute over the valuation of Men's Exclusive Woven Trousers, where the declared value per piece for drawback claim was Rs. 168.89, leading to a Customs investigation due to suspicion of over-valuation. 2. The Customs alleged over-invoicing based on their findings that similar garments were available for Rs. 100, despite the exporter's costing statement of material and labor at Rs. 108.50, which included interest and risk factors but not profit. The exporter denied over-invoicing, stating that negotiated prices matched the documents. 3. The Commissioner found poor fabric quality and stitching upon examination of the goods, a point not raised during the exporter's interrogation. This led to the confiscation of goods, redemption on fine payment, and imposition of penalties, prompting the appeal. 4. The Tribunal considered the possibility of over-invoicing in export consignments and highlighted government schemes allowing a certain extent of over-invoicing for export incentives. Instances of abuse in schemes were noted, emphasizing the need for scrutiny. 5. The margin of profit alleged in Departmental enquiries was 35%, with the exporter consistently maintaining a material cost of around Rs. 108. The Tribunal questioned the expertise of Customs in valuing trousers and noted differences between the exporter's products and the sample shown. 6. Emphasizing reasonable price variations in export and import goods, the Tribunal cautioned against presuming under or over-invoicing without substantial evidence. The exporter's refusal to admit over-invoicing was considered, along with the lack of sufficient market enquiries to disprove the valuation. 7. Ultimately, the appeal succeeded, with the Tribunal granting consequential relief based on the lack of concrete evidence supporting deliberate over-invoicing in the export goods.
|