Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2002 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (9) TMI 224 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......le to confiscation and that consequently he was liable to penalty. The department has not discharged the burden of proof cast upon it to establish that the ingredients of Section 112, under which penalty has been imposed, are made out against the appellant. 6. Therefore, I set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal with consequential relief.
|