Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (1) TMI 121 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......company appellant No. 1. That being so, confirmation of duty with penalty against company appellant No. 1 and imposition of penalties on the other appellants under Rule 209A cannot be sustained. 8. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside and the appeals of the appellants are allowed with consequential relief, if any permissible under the law.
|