Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (6) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (6) TMI 110 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......llants. Rather penalty has been imposed under another sub-rule i.e. 1(A) of Rule 96ZP under which no duty had been demanded from the appellants. 4. In view of the discussion made above, the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is set aside. The appeal of the appellants is allowed with consequential relief, if any, permissible under the law.
|