Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (7) TMI 229 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: ....... 8-5-99. Therefore, in this situation the respondents are not entitled for abatement for 8-5-99. The impugned order is modified to this extent only and in the absence of any evidence that respondents carried out any manufacturing activity during this period, we find no infirmity with the impugned order. The appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
|