Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1998 (3) TMI 3 - SUPREME COURT
Held that Sub-section (1) is not confined to only that person who was subjected to search and seizure operations and against whom the order u/s 132(5) was passed. The words "any person" appearing in sub-section (11) of section 132 of the Act are significant and even a third party can make an application to the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner